Literature Monitor

Increased Length of Stay for Invasive Monitoring Does Not Reduce Hospital’s Bottom Line

Contrary to conventional wisdom, longer LOS may not impact profits.


 

Length of stay (LOS) may not be the best metric to use when trying to determine the cost effectiveness of invasive monitoring with subdural grid implantation or stereoelectroencephalography, suggests a recent analysis of 76 patients over a 2 year period. Researchers found that as LOS increased a hospital’s profit and contribution margins also increased, while patients maintained a low rate of complications. Investigators concluded that increased LOS does not necessarily result in lower financial gain for institutions.

Chan AY, Kharrat S. Lundeen K, et al. Length of stay for patients undergoing invasive electrode monitoring with stereoelectroencephalography and subdural grids correlates positively with increased institutional profitability [published online April 20, 2017]. Epilespia. doi:10.1111/epi.13737

Recommended Reading

Deciphering the Significance of Generalized Periodic Discharges
Epilepsy Resource Center
Why Do Patients Vary in Their Response to Cortical Electric Stimulation?
Epilepsy Resource Center
Mood and Memory Problems Associated With Deep Brain Stimulation
Epilepsy Resource Center
How to Manage the Risks Associated With Epilepsy and Pregnancy
Epilepsy Resource Center
Epilepsy or Seizure Disorder? The Effect of Cultural and Socioeconomic Factors on Self-Reported Prevalence
Epilepsy Resource Center
The Risk of Seizures Following Stroke
Epilepsy Resource Center
Patients With Refractory Focal Epilepsy Have Older Brains
Epilepsy Resource Center
No Link Found Between Spike Frequency and Surgical Outcomes
Epilepsy Resource Center
Mesial Temporal Lobe Epilepsy Responds Well to Neurostimulation
Epilepsy Resource Center
Uniform Approach Needed for Death Certification in SUDEP
Epilepsy Resource Center