Savvy Psychopharmacology

Impact of the MTHFR C677T genetic variant on depression

Author and Disclosure Information

 

References

Medication changes based on MTHFR: What is the evidence?

Some evidence supports the use of active folate supplementation to improve symptoms of MDD.

Shelton et al3 conducted an observational study that assessed the effects of adding L-methylfolate (brand name: Deplin), 7.5 or 15 mg, to existing antidepressant therapy in 502 patients with MDD who had baseline PHQ-9 scores of at least 5. After an average 95 days of therapy, PHQ-9 scores were reduced by a mean of 8.5 points, with 67.9% of patients achieving at least a 50% reduction in PHQ-9 scores. The study did not take into account patients’ MTHFR genotype or differentiate results between the 2 doses of L-methylfolate.3

Papakostas et al13 performed 2 randomized, double-blind, parallel-sequential, placebo-controlled trials of L-methylfolate for patients with MDD. The first compared L-methylfolate, 7.5 and 15 mg, to placebo, without regard to MTHFR genotype.13 There was no significant difference between the 7.5-mg dose and placebo, or the 15-mg dose and placebo. However, among the group receiving the 15-mg dose, the response rate was 24%, vs 9% in the placebo group, which approached significance (P = .1). Papakostas et al13 followed up with a smaller trial comparing the 15-mg dose alone to placebo, and found the response rate was 32.3% in patients treated with L-methylfolate compared with 14.6% in the placebo group (P = .04).13

Although the Shelton et al3 and Papakostas et al13 studies showed some improvement in depressive symptom scores among patients who received L-methylfolate supplementation, an important consideration is if MTHFR genotype may predict patient response to this therapy.

Papakostas et al14 performed a post hoc analysis of their earlier study to assess potential associations amongst multiple other biomarkers of inflammation and metabolic disturbances hypothesized by the authors to be associated with MDD, as well as body mass index (BMI), with treatment outcome.14 When change in the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-28 (HDRS-28) was analyzed by C677T and A1298C variant groups (677 CT vs TT and 1298 AC vs CC), no statistically significant improvements were identified (C677T mean change from baseline −3.8 points, P = .087; A1298C mean change from baseline −0.5 points, P = .807).14 However, statistically significant improvements in HDRS-28 scores were observed compared with baseline when the C677T genotype was pooled with other biomarkers, including methionine synthase (MTR 2756 AG/GG, −23.3 points vs baseline, P < .001) and a voltage-dependent calcium channel (CACNAIC AG/AA, −9 points vs baseline, P < .001), as well as with BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 (−9.9 points vs baseline, P = .001).14

Continue to: Mech and Farah...

Pages

Recommended Reading

Evaluate, manage the stress response in susceptible individuals affected by COVID-19
MDedge Psychiatry
Counterintuitive findings for domestic violence during COVID-19
MDedge Psychiatry
The gut a new therapeutic target for major depression?
MDedge Psychiatry
Reassuring findings on SSRIs and diabetes risk in children
MDedge Psychiatry
ECG promising for predicting major depression, treatment response
MDedge Psychiatry
Breathing enriched oxygen improves major depression
MDedge Psychiatry
Suicide rates up significantly among adolescents, young adults
MDedge Psychiatry
Suicidality jumped in Israel during spring COVID-19 lockdown
MDedge Psychiatry
Listening to Tim Ferriss
MDedge Psychiatry
Cognitive impairments in major depression cluster in three patterns
MDedge Psychiatry