Q&A

Educational interventions improve outcomes for children with asthma

Author and Disclosure Information

  • BACKGROUND: A previously published meta-analysis suggested that asthma education programs for children do not affect asthma-related morbidity or use of health care resources. However, a number of new studies do show improved clinical outcomes resulting from such programs. This meta-analysis incorporates these more recent studies.
  • POPULATION STUDIED: This meta-analysis pooled results from 32 controlled clinical trials of asthma education interventions for children. Eligible trials enrolled a total of 3706 children with mild, moderate, or severe asthma who were aged 2 to 18 years.
  • STUDY DESIGN AND VALIDITY: For this quantitative meta-analysis, the authors conducted a systematic search for eligible controlled trials of asthma education interventions targeting children, employing both electronic and hand searches. While the interventions studied varied widely in intensity and focus, trials of simple information-only educational interventions were excluded.
  • OUTCOMES MEASURED: Eight different asthma-related outcomes were considered: lung function as measured by forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) or peak expiratory flow rate, number of days absent from school, number of days of restricted activity, number of disturbed nights, self-efficacy scales, symptom scores, number of visits to an emergency department, and hospitalizations.
  • RESULTS: This meta-analysis provides some evidence for a modest effect of asthma education interventions for children in particular. Lung function increased, with FEV1 increasing an average of 0.24 L and peak flow measures increasing an average of 9.5, though it did not consistently affect symptom scores. The number of days of restricted activity were moderately decreased (effect size, –0.29; 95% CI, –0.49 to –0.08).


 

PRACTICE RECOMMENDATIONS

Asthma education interventions for children may result in modest improvement in a wide range of clinical outcomes. Interventions should target children with more severe asthma and teach them to use objective measures of lung function, such as peak flow for self-monitoring instead of symptombased self-monitoring.

Recommended Reading

Are antibiotics effective for otitis media with effusion?
MDedge Family Medicine
Are tympanostomy tubes indicated for recurrent acute otitis media?
MDedge Family Medicine
How should we manage infants at risk for group B streptococcal disease?
MDedge Family Medicine
Are nasal steroid sprays effective for otitis media with effusion?
MDedge Family Medicine
Breastfeeding reduces pain in neonates
MDedge Family Medicine
Admission electronic fetal monitoring does not improve neonatal outcomes
MDedge Family Medicine
Patients with mild scoliosis have good prognosis
MDedge Family Medicine
Are early exposures linked with childhood peanut allergy?
MDedge Family Medicine
Steroids ineffective for pain in children with pharyngitis
MDedge Family Medicine
Naturopathic ear drops minimally effective for acute otitis media
MDedge Family Medicine