Conference Coverage

Prostate cancer risk before age 55 higher for black men


 

REPORTING FROM THE AUA ANNUAL MEETING

– Among men aged younger than 55 years undergoing prostate biopsies, black men were more likely to have a diagnosis of prostate cancer, according to a new study that drew subjects aged 40-54 years from three public and two private hospitals in the Chicago area.

Black race, rather than socioeconomic or clinical factors, appeared to be the strongest nonmodifiable predictor of prostate cancer risk in that age group, the researchers concluded, based on multivariate analyses that examined the association between prostate cancer risk and clinical setting, race, genetically determined West African ancestry, and clinical and socioeconomic risk factors.

Dr. Oluwarotimi S. Nettey of Northwestern University, Chicago

Dr. Oluwarotimi S. Nettey

The study included 564 men older than age 40 years undergoing initial prostate biopsy for abnormal prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels or digital rectal examination results from three publicly funded and two private hospitals during 2009-2014. When limiting the analysis to men younger than age 55 years, black race (odds ratio,13.49; P = .01) and family history (OR, 5.12; P = .03) were independently associated with overall prostate cancer diagnosis.

The results suggest that screening practices should be altered, said study investigator Oluwarotimi S. Nettey, MD, of Northwestern University, Chicago. “You might want to think about screening black men who are younger than 55.”

“In the prebiopsy space, most studies have looked at race, age, PSA [level], and prostate volume, and they’ve said that the reason we see that black men have disparate prostate cancer risk on diagnosis is probably because of access to care issues, so that’s been the confounder. We tried to control for this by looking at socioeconomic status through income, marriage, and education, as well as hospital setting,” said Dr. Nettey, who presented the study at a poster session at the annual meeting of the American Urological Association.

Previous studies have examined populations and then conducted a secondary analysis on outcomes in black men. The current study has greater power and is more convincing because outcomes in black men was the primary outcome of the study, according to Robert L. Waterhouse Jr., MD, who is the public policy liaison for the R. Frank Jones Urological Society of the National Medical Association. Dr. Waterhouse, a urologist in Charlotte, N.C., attended the poster session and was not involved in the research.

“This study helps to provide some evidence that black heritage is indeed a significant risk factor in men who develop prostate cancer at an earlier age, and efforts at identifying prostate cancer at an earlier age [should consider] black race as a high-risk group,” said Dr. Waterhouse.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Alternating therapy in renal cell carcinoma fails to show an advantage
MDedge Family Medicine
VIDEO: Low testosterone common after testicular cancer
MDedge Family Medicine
Hypogonadism after testicular cancer treatment can have lifelong impact
MDedge Family Medicine
Is pain or dependency driving elevated opioid use among long-term cancer survivors?
MDedge Family Medicine
FDA authorizes first direct-to-consumer BRCA1/2 test
MDedge Family Medicine
New regimen looks good in stage IV favorable histology Wilms
MDedge Family Medicine
World Trade Center responders face greater cancer burden, including greater risk of multiple myeloma
MDedge Family Medicine
Phototherapy has lasting benefit in low-risk prostate cancer
MDedge Family Medicine
ACS: Screen for colon cancer at 45
MDedge Family Medicine
Equal treatment, equal or better prostate cancer outcomes for black men
MDedge Family Medicine