Major Finding: At 24 weeks, Patient Global Assessment scores improved in 50% of the 304 heart failure patients receiving intravenous iron and in 28% of the 155 patients on placebo.
Data Source: FAIR-HF, placebo-controlled phase III study of 459 patients, from 75 sites in 11 countries, randomized to iron or placebo.
Disclosures: The study was sponsored by Vifor Pharma, a Swiss company that markets Ferinject in Europe. Dr. Anker has received fees from Vifor; he also has received fees from Roche and Amgen.
ORLANDO — The clinical benefits from intravenous iron in chronic heart failure seen in a placebo-controlled study of 459 patients abruptly made iron repletion a new, plausible treatment for a sizeable fraction of heart failure patients.
“This is a new therapeutic concept. When patients [with heart failure] are symptomatic, physicians should think about iron deficiency,” Dr. Stefan D. Anker said at the annual scientific sessions of the American Heart Association. The study results also showed that the boost from iron occurred regardless of whether patients were anemic before starting treatment, a finding that suggests iron helps patients by a mechanism that does not involve hemoglobin.
The study findings “are very intriguing. Iron deficiency hasn't been on our radar screen,” commented Dr. Mariell L. Jessup, professor of medicine and associate chief of clinical affairs in the division of cardiovascular medicine at the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia.“I think this is something that people will start to act on quickly.”
“Iron deficiency is extremely common in this population,” commented Dr. John G.F. Cleland, professor and chairman of cardiology at the University of Hull, England.
Despite the promising new results, Dr. Anker stressed that the study was not powered to adequately address safety or efficacy end points such as survival and hospitalization. Further study is needed to build up a larger experience with the tested agent, ferric carboxymaltose, in heart failure patients, although Dr. Anker's study included 150 patient-years of treatment with this drug with no hint of excess adverse events aside from an expected, modest increase in gastrointestinal disorders. Dr. Anker also expressed eagerness to test this strategy in patients with diastolic dysfunction: heart failure with preserved left ventricular function.
About 20%–30% of heart failure patients likely have iron deficiency, said Dr. Anker, professor in the Center for Cardiovascular Research at Charit University in Berlin. Dr. Cleland said this estimate probably underestimates the actual prevalence.
Iron deficiency is probably prevalent in many heart failure patients because of a combination of poor diet and poor gastrointestinal absorption, and because of increased bleeding linked with aspirin use, Dr. Cleland said.
The Ferinject Assessment in Patients With Iron Deficiency and Chronic Heart Failure (FAIR-HF) trial enrolled patients during June 2007–December 2008 at 75 sites in 11 countries. Dr. Anker and his associates screened more than 950 patients to find the 459 who fulfilled the study's criteria for heart failure and serum ferritin level. Eligible patients had either New York Heart Association class III heart failure and a left ventricular ejection fraction of 45% or less, or class II heart failure and an ejection fraction of 40% or less. Their hemoglobin at enrollment could be 95–135 g/L, and so the study included nearly equal numbers of patients with anemia (hemoglobin of 120 g/L or less) and those without (more than 120 g/L). Their average age was 68, and 82% had class III heart failure.
Patients were randomized on a two-to-one basis to receive an intravenous, bolus injection of ferric carboxymaltose equivalent to 200 mg iron weekly or placebo. Once iron repletion occurred, after 8 or 12 weeks, the dosage was scaled back to one injection every 4 weeks.
After 24 weeks, the self-reported Patient Global Assessment was at least moderately improved in 50% of the 304 patients receiving iron and in 28% of the 155 patients on placebo, a statistically significant difference for this primary end point. New York Heart Association heart failure class improved in 47% of the patients on iron and in 30% of the control patients, also a significant difference in the second primary end point. The results appeared in an article published online (N. Engl. J. Med. 2009 Nov. 17 [doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0908355
During the study, mortality rates were 3% in the iron group and 6% in the control patients, a nonsignificant difference. Hospitalization for any cardiovascular reason occurred in 10% of the iron patients and 20% of the controls, a difference that came close to, but did not reach, statistical significance. Cardiac disorders of any type were significantly more common in the control patients, 50%, than in those on iron, 28%. The most notable adverse event more common in the iron patients was gastrointestinal disorder, in 17% of the iron patients and 7% of the controls, a difference that just missed statistical significance.