News

Studies Examine Scenarios of Changing Triptan Regimens


 

AT THE ANNUAL MEETING OF THE AMERICAN HEADACHE SOCIETY

LOS ANGELES – In patients using triptans for the acute treatment of migraine, the impact on headache-related disability of switching or adding medications depends on the frequency of attacks and the type of medication, new data show.

Dr. Richard B. Lipton and Dawn C. Buse, Ph.D., both of the Albert Einstein College of Medicine in New York, and their colleagues assessed associations between treatment changes and disability among more than 1,500 triptan users from the longitudinal, population-based AMPP (American Migraine Prevalence and Prevention) study, reporting their findings at the annual meeting of the American Headache Society.

Susan London/IMNG Medical Media

Dr. Richard B. Lipton

In one analysis, patients switching to NSAIDs or to combination analgesics containing an opioid or a barbiturate had respective 31% and 48% worsening in scores for headache-related disability, compared with nonswitchers, but patients staying on the triptan or switching to another one did not have any significant change in score. In stratified analyses, switching to an NSAID was associated with a worsening among the subset of patients having the most frequent attacks.

The second study found that adding an NSAID to the triptan improved scores for patients with medium-frequency episodic migraines, while adding an NSAID or another triptan worsened scores for those with high-frequency episodic migraines or chronic migraines. Patients with low-frequency episodic migraines did not have any change regardless of the medication added.

"On average, the changes clinicians make in prescription drug therapy in the real world, switching from one triptan to another or adding a second triptan, are not helpful," Dr. Lipton commented. "That is not to say that when we switch individual patients, there isn’t a benefit to that or that optimized algorithms for choosing treatments have no effect on patient care. But it is to say that maybe when we think about what to do with patients who don’t respond to medications, it’s worth considering that switching triptans on average doesn’t have the benefits for disability that I certainly previously thought."

The studies may have had the bias of confounding by indication, whereby the reasons for medication changes (which were unknown) influenced outcomes, he acknowledged. "But they do have the strength of generalizability and reflecting what actually goes on in the real world."

Session attendee Dr. James Couch of the University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, expressed concern about the possible confounding.

"Most of us have found that all the triptans are not equal, and if you go through the whole list of seven, it’s not unlikely that you will find one that works better than others and so on," he elaborated. Thus, some patients on one triptan "may have gotten a moderate effect, and they were still looking for a triptan that was going to have that whiz-bang effect." Also, insurance company requirements may dictate medication switches in some cases.

Dr. Peter Goadsby of the University of California, San Francisco, asked whether analyses were masking the heterogeneity of response in the study sample. "It strikes me that in practice, it’s quite heterogeneous: You make a change in some patients, they do spectacularly well, or maybe it’s just luck, and other patients don’t," he commented. "So is there more than one population, and are you losing some granularity in what we do by having them all lumped together?"

"Our reason for stratifying by attack frequency was to try to reduce that heterogeneity," Dr. Lipton replied. "And when we stratify by attack frequency, we see some pretty robust effects."

Finally, session co-moderator Dr. Andrew Hershey of the Cincinnati Children’s Hospital wondered if the directionality of association was perhaps reversed, and headache-related disability had instead prompted the medication changes.

Dr. Lipton noted that the investigators assessed changes in score from before to after a medication switch, in addition to using stratification. "So that’s our attempt to take baseline differences into account, though it’s certainly imperfect," he acknowledged.

Switching Medications

Dr. Buse and her colleagues studied the impact of medication switches from one year to the next in 799 patients with migraine taking triptans for acute treatment.

Susan London/IMNG Medical Media

Dr. Dawn C. Buse

"Providers commonly switch patients in their acute pharmacologic regimens, we know that. We switch medications for a variety of reasons: patient preference, nonresponse, what is allowed by third-party payers," she commented. However, most studies of switching medications have looked at short-term outcomes, and few have looked at switches to or from triptans.

Fully 83% of the patients studied continued on the same triptan, 10% switched to another triptan, 4% switched to a combination analgesic containing an opioid or barbiturate, and 3% switched to an NSAID.

Pages

Recommended Reading

Assessing Pediatric Pain Takes a Child-Size Approach
MDedge Family Medicine
Managing Two Edges of the Opioid Sword
MDedge Family Medicine
Prescribe Chronic Opiates Safely and Efficiently
MDedge Family Medicine
New Device Cuts Fibromyalgia Pain in Pilot Study
MDedge Family Medicine
NSAIDs Retard Bone Formation In Ankylosing Spondylitis
MDedge Family Medicine
Mass. Insurer Clamps Down on Opioid Prescriptions
MDedge Family Medicine
Use of complementary therapies to treat the pain of osteoarthritis
MDedge Family Medicine
Sports concussion: A return-to-play guide
MDedge Family Medicine
Painful leg mass
MDedge Family Medicine
Gallbladder surgery uncovers something more...Diagnosis minus treatment equals catastrophe...more
MDedge Family Medicine