Clinical Inquiries

What levels of cholesterol should be treated for primary prevention?

Author and Disclosure Information

 

References

EVIDENCE-BASED ANSWER

The levels of cholesterol that should be treated for primary prevention are based on low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels of > 100 mg/dL to > 190 mg/dL and vary according to whether the patient’s risk is high, moderate, or low. See the table to estimate risk. Grade of recommendation for medication indications: A (on the basis of high-quality randomized controlled trials). Grade of recommendation for lifestyle indications: B (on the basis of extrapolations from randomized controlled trials).

TABLE
Adult treatment recommendations from NCEP, Adult Treatment Panel III

Risk categoryLDL-C levelLDL-C goal* at which to consider medication
Coronary heart disease risk equivalents< 100 mg/dL≥ 130 mg/dL; ≥100-129 mg/dL optional
2 or more major risk factors< 130 mg/dL10-year risk‡ 10-20%: ≥ 130 mg/dL; 10-year risk‡ < 10%: ≥160 mg/dL
0 or 1 major risk factor< 160 mg/dL≥ 190 mg/dL; 160-190 mg/dL optional
NOTE: CHD risk equivalents include symptomatic carotid artery disease, peripheral arterial disease, abdominal aortic aneurysm, diabetes, and a 10-year risk of > 20% (see ‡ below). The cutoff points for therapy for patients with clinical CHD are the same as for CHD risk equivalents.
* Initiate therapeutic lifestyle changes above these levels.
†Major risk factors include cigarette smoking, hypertension, HDL < 40 mg/dL, family history of premature CHD (CHD in first-degree male relative < 55 y; CHD in first-degree female relative < 65 y), age (men ≥ 45 y, women ≥ 55 y).
‡To calculate 10-year risk, use the Framingham Tables, available at http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/guidelines/cholesterol/risk_tbl.htm.

Evidence summary

Statins are the most effective at reducing LDL-C and the associated cardiovascular risk. The 5-year West of Scotland study (WOSCOPS) showed that a 26% reduction in LDL-C (from a mean of 192 to 142 mg/dL) using pravastatin 40 mg per day reduced the risk of either nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI) or coronary heart disease (CHD) death (number needed to treat [NNT] = 42; relative risk [RR] = 31; 95% confidence interval [CI],17 - 43).1 This trial enrolled middle-aged men with an LDL-C level > 155 mg/dL without a history of prior MI, although subjects with stable angina (5% of the participants) were still eligible. Similar reductions were seen in cardiovascular death and in all-cause death (RR = 22; 95% CI = 0 - 40). Lovastatin reduced the risk of a first major acute coronary event (NNT = 24) in the 5-year AFCAPS/TexCAPS trial that enrolled 5608 men and 997 women with below-average high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) (men, 36 mg/dL; women, 40 mg/dL) without signs or symptoms of CHD.2 LDL-C was lowered 25% (from a mean of 156 to 115 mg/dL). Unpublished results suggest that simvastatin may have a similar effect. Primary prevention data are still lacking for atorvastatin and fluvastatin.

The 7-year Lipid Research Clinics Coronary Prevention Trial (LRC-CPPT) documented a reduction in CHD death and/or nonfatal MI (NNT = 59) with a 12.6% reduction in LDL-C with the use of cholestyramine, a bile acid resin, 24 g per day.3

Results of studies of the fibric acid derivatives are mixed. Subjects taking gemfibrozil 1200 mg per day in the 5-year Helsinki Heart Study had fewer coronary events compared with those taking a placebo (NNT = 71).4 Subsequent analysis suggests that patients with a high LDL-C/HDL-C ratio (> 5) plus hypertriglyceridemia ( 205 mg/dL) benefited the most.5 Clofibrate is no longer used because of an unexplained increase in deaths in the WHO Cooperative Trial.6 To date, outcomes in fenofibrate trials have only focused on surrogate markers and not long-term clinical outcomes.

Recommendations from others

The recommendations of the Third Report of the National Cholesterol Education Program7 (NCEP, Adult Treatment Panel III) are in the table. This report is an excellent source of additional information (http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/guidelines/cholesterol/atp3xsum.pdf).

Read a clinical commentary by David Switzer, MD, at www.fpin.org.

Evidence-based answers from the Family Physicians Inquiries Network

Recommended Reading

Does long-term erythromycin treatment reduce the number of common cold infections and subsequent exacerbations in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)?
MDedge Family Medicine
Can a simple warfarin initiation scheme predict the maintenance dose in patients with nonrheumatic atrial fibrillation?
MDedge Family Medicine
In patients with diabetes and hypertension, should treatment start with an ACE inhibitor instead of a diuretic or beta blocker?
MDedge Family Medicine
Should antioxidants be added to simvastatin and niacin for patients with coronary disease?
MDedge Family Medicine
What is the relative cardiovascular benefit of lowering cholesterol, blood pressure, and glucose levels in patients with type 2 diabetes?
MDedge Family Medicine
In patients with heart disease, is the benefit of lipid-lowering therapy with statins similar in older patients to that in younger patients?
MDedge Family Medicine
In low to moderate risk patients with chest pain, is a 6-hour protocol able to accurately rule out acute myocardial infarction (AMI)?
MDedge Family Medicine
Are new antihypertensive agents better than old antihypertensive agents in preventing cardiovascular complications?
MDedge Family Medicine
What Do We Know About Socioeconomic Status And Congestive Heart Failure? A Review of the Literature
MDedge Family Medicine
Does the Patient’s Sex Influence Cardiovascular Outcome After Acute Myocardial Infarction?
MDedge Family Medicine