News

Mortality similar for intermediate- and low-risk prostate cancer

View on the News

Caution needed in extending active surveillance

The question of whether active surveillance can be safely extended to patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer is a subject of great interest; however, it is unclear whether the results of this study would have been the same if the patients had been under active surveillance instead of undergoing brachytherapy.

Further study and improved understanding of the biology of prostate cancer is required, but in the meantime, caution and extreme selectivity must be applied in offering active surveillance to patients with intermediate-risk disease.

Dr. Fred Saad is with the department of surgery at the University of Montreal. These comments are taken from an accompanying editorial (JAMA Oncology 2015 Feb. 19 [doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.103]. There were no conflicts of interest declared.


 

References

Men with favorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer could be considered for active surveillance, say the authors of a study, published in JAMA Oncology, showing no significant increase in prostate cancer–specific mortality in this group, compared with those with low-risk disease.

Dr. Ann C. Raldow

Dr. Ann C. Raldow

The prospective cohort study in 5,580 men with brachytherapy-treated localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate defined favorable intermediate-risk disease as a Gleason score of 3 + 4 or less, below 50% positive biopsy scores, and one or fewer National Comprehensive Cancer Network determinants of intermediate-risk prostate cancer.

Researchers found no significant increases in prostate cancer–specific or all-cause mortality in the favorable intermediate-risk group, compared with the low-risk group (JAMA Oncology 2015 Feb. 19 [doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2014.284]).

“This lack of a significant difference in the risk of PCSM [prostate cancer–specific mortality] was evident even though men with low-risk PC had lower median PSA levels, did not have Gleason 3 + 4 disease, and were more likely to have AJCC T1c [American Joint Committee on Cancer T1c] disease, all of which could have caused men with favorable intermediate-risk PC to have a higher risk of PCSM,” wrote Dr. Ann C. Raldow from the Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, and her coauthors.

There were no conflicts of interest declared.

Recommended Reading

International study characterizes male breast cancer
MDedge Family Medicine
Topical androgen use by sexual partner linked to high testosterone in prostate cancer patient
MDedge Family Medicine
ADT plus RT more effective in reducing prostate cancer mortality than ADT alone in geriatric men
MDedge Family Medicine
Bariatric surgery linked to lower mortality
MDedge Family Medicine
HIM Study: Prevalent HVP-16 infections tend to persist
MDedge Family Medicine
FDA panel votes against approval of oral desmopressin for nocturia
MDedge Family Medicine
Is red-yeast rice a safe and effective alternative to statins?
MDedge Family Medicine
RA risk lowered by recent gastrointestinal and urogenital infections
MDedge Family Medicine
ASCO endorses ACS guidelines for prostate cancer survivor care
MDedge Family Medicine
Study confirms value of adding radiotherapy to ADT in advanced prostate cancer
MDedge Family Medicine