The federal government's portrayal of enrollment growth in the State Children's Health Insurance Program in 2007 is disingenuous and somewhat misleading, advocates for children's programs said.
According to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, 7.1 million children were enrolled in the program (SCHIP) in 2007, up from 6.7 million in 2006.
“While we are pleased that SCHIP continues to grow, we must do more to reach those at the lowest income levels who still need this coverage,” Mike Leavitt, Health and Human Services secretary, said in a statement. “Toward that end, we will continue to work with Congress on the reauthorization of this vital program.”
That comment is “disingenuous,” Dr. Steve Wegner, chairman of the child health funding committee at the American Academy of Pediatrics, said in an interview. He noted that President Bush vetoed a compromise agreement to reauthorize SCHIP not once, but twice, in 2007.
“The administration did everything possible to stand in the way of the reauthorization,” Jenny Sullivan, a health policy analyst with Families USA, said in an interview.
SCHIP was finally given a reprieve, with Congress passing, and the president signing, a funding extension through March 2009. But the program still has not been formally reauthorized.
And, said Ms. Sullivan and Dr. Wegner, many millions more children would have been covered in 2007 if the reauthorization had been approved when it was first taken up early in the year.
CMS spokeswoman Mary Kahn said it was not accurate to imply that the Bush administration did not want to continue the SCHIP program. The administration did, however, want to fund it at a lower level, she said in an interview.
Also in the HHS statement, Kerry Weems, CMS acting administrator, said, “We continue to work with states to [ensure] as many eligible, uninsured children as possible are enrolled in SCHIP and Medicaid.”
Dr. Wegner took exception to that statement as well, noting that a CMS directive issued in August 2007 has effectively prevented states from expanding eligibility. The CMS said it would limit states' ability to expand coverage to children in families who had incomes at 250% of the poverty level or above. Ms. Sullivan said that the directive had, in many cases, reversed expansion plans previously approved by the CMS.
According to the Kaiser Family Foundation, 23 states are expected to be affected by the directive. Nine already cover children in families with incomes above 250%, and 13 states had received approval to expand eligibility at or above that level. In addition, Washington was covering children at the 250% level and had gotten approval to raise that cap.
The directive is consistent with the administration's belief that every effort should be made to enroll 95% of children eligible at the lowest income levels before expanding it to those who are in higher-income families, said Ms. Kahn.
The increase in SCHIP enrollment was not unusually high for the program, said Ms. Sullivan. And, she said, U.S. Census Bureau figures indicate that the overall number of uninsured children actually increased in the last 2 years.
There are about 9 million uninsured children in the United States, according to a Families USA analysis. Both Ms. Sullivan and Dr. Wegner said they expect that number to grow in the current year, as states face harsh budget realities.
A much larger number of children are covered under traditional Medicaid programs—about 28 million in 2005, according to Kaiser—but their coverage is also being threatened because of a series of CMS regulations taking effect this year. Rep. John Dingell (D-Mich.) and Rep. Tim Murphy (R-Penn.) introduced a bill in March (H.R. 5613) that would place a 1-year moratorium on seven of those regulations. According to estimates they cite from the Congressional Budget Office, the regulations could translate to $20 billion in cuts to Medicaid over the next 5 years.
The National Governors Association, the National Association of State Medicaid Directors, and the American Public Human Services Association, have all expressed their opposition to the regulations in letters to HHS.